Thursday, 6 November 2014

Joseph Angelo October 27 at 9:11am RE- Foamers Talk


Anyone check out Foamer Talk today? Lots of familiar faces.
LikeLike ·  · 
  • 5 people like this.
  • Joseph Angelo Report. Report. Report. I might add.
  • Carol Miller She is simply raving here. Difficult to see how she has any life other than this.
  • James Hassinger I never check it they're crazy bullies
  • William Johnson I refuse to look, but I can guess I'm there. Kim has a very unhealthy obsession with me when I looked at it once before.
  • Cat Cleeb Reported the page again. Does the person who runs it realize that almost all of what they post doesn't even have a single like? Even less comments? Only 79 people like the page. If only a page could be blocked!
  • Fataah Ewe' I've never been there. There's only so much of this I can digest.
  • Ryan McCabe Billy, just pay the $22. Today? Tomorrow? Next year, mebbie?
  • Rachel Simas The page that posted that offer requested a name and address to send the $22 and have received no response. Can't pay someone who won't tell you who they are or how to get the money to them.
  • Joseph Angelo It makes me so mad. I know I shouldn't look but it's like trying not to eavesdrop on someone you know is talking about you! I don't understand how you can defame people with no repercussions. Total b.s.
  • Ryan McCabe It doesn't bother me, what she posts about me. The one about me sending a Facebook message to a family member was pretty amusing. Oh, and the one with Christy and I on a couch.
  • Rachel Simas It's not like anyone is listening to her. She might as well be talking about us to a brick wall for all the impact it'll ever have on our lives.
  • Dennis Baker I see they are helping me sell my car. To bad they don't have any followers so I could get better advertisement. 
  • Joseph Angelo alright. i feel better. thanks y'all.
  • Cat Cleeb Lovely haha. Thanks Ryan. I don't see whoever is running that page sharing any of their info. Hypocritical nutters. Go figure.
  • AJ Ravinsky How come they don't have my pic up there? lol
  • Cat Cleeb I commented on the post of me calling him/her/it out and they of course deleted my comment and blocked me from commenting again lol. What a joke they are.
  • Susan DeVilder I don't waste my time with morons.
  • Christy Cornell I actually like it when I show up on on Kim Whateverherlastnameis silly page. She really reaches for comedy bits and is weak with her little jabs, so it doesn't do anything except get her couple of minions excited. I'm glad to keep Kim busy. If she is sniping at me, she has less time to harass pitbull attacks victims. 

    Hi Kimmy!  Put that on Foamer talk.
  • Marie McGrath Cat, they are very weak minded. Can dish it out but can't take it. That page is doomed. B-O-R-I-N-G.. Good luck selling your car Dennis. Lol
  • Cat Cleeb Haha I love it Christy. You know she'd never post that. Yes they are very weak minded. It shows in the lack of likes and comments.
  • Christy Cornell Ryan McCabe I like that we are a couple now. I won't tell my husband if you won't tell your boyfriend.  

    Wonder where Kimmy found that picture of the couple on couch? She really could have done so much worse than that, but she didn't. Weird, huh? Somewhere, deep down inside, she must still love us. Kisses!
  • James Hassinger wow she really needs that $22 for that one person killed in 41 years by a coconut. Also, 1 in 41 years, while pit bulls have killed how many hundreds in 41 years? Guess the meme needs to be changed, you're 400 times more likely to be killed by a Pit bull than a falling coconut LOL
  • Nicole Marie I think 22 of us would be happy to chip in a $1 to make you stfu about it, Ryan. seriously- resolve this in PMs
  • Christy Cornell As of this moment, I have 1 FB account. I have never really been interested in the whole social networking thing, so I mainly just use it for BSL activism. A couple of weeks ago, Kimmy begged her minions to report me and get me kicked off FB. Hasn't happened yet, but if it ever does, it will be just the catalyst I need to go make a bunch of fake accounts. Kim already has a bunch of fake accounts. She was kicked off of a certain site that I shall not mention, but kept coming back as several trolls. Silly Kimmy. Girl, we all knew it was you.
  • James Hassinger I have a feeling kimmy trolls a lot of facebook pages. Wouldn't be surprised if she kicks kittens too.
  • Christy Cornell LOL! You can be sure she will read every word we write here.
  • Ryan McCabe It's down to 18 dollars, so he's getting there. I see my Husky has been featured with him. Onyx enjoys it! So, when are you going to get down to zero, Billy? Next week? December? February, mebbie?
  • Ryan McCabe Christy, I've wanted you since I learned we're both foamers. Don't tell Matt.
  • Christy Cornell Cat Cleeb I'm not surprised that your comment was deleted from Foamer Talk. Kimmy deletes any comment that zings her too bad or shows that she is a Pinocchio nosed liar. When she isn't photoshopping and posting fake pictures of us, Kim likes to take stuff out of context, so she would never let her minions actually see all that was said. She cherry picks and stretches the truth. 
    If I was you, I wouldn't bother posting to Foamer Talk. If you want to make a rebuttal to something said there, take a screen shot of Kim's post and make your rebuttal on a pro-BSL page. That way you don't have to worry about Kim deleting it and blocking you. She controls that page, so you can bet she won't play fair. Besides that, if we start posting on Foamer talk it will just increase her traffic. The nutters would love to debate us on their poisoned ground because they have an unfair advantage. Kim is desperate to grow that Foamer Talk site, so she'd love it if we post there. I wouldn't give her that. 

    And like I already mentioned, Kim has a lot of fake accounts. She has moles in most all of our pro-BSL groups, so she will see your rebuttal. And so will your fellow BSL advocates, so that's the important thing. Who cares if the other minion nutters on Foamer talk ever see anything or not. They don't matter.
  • Christy Cornell I talked with an administrator of this site and they said it was fine to post rebuttals there if anyone wanted. 

    https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1540850969466542
  • Christy Cornell Hahahaha! Ryan McCabe , it's our little secret! This is gonna get good!
  • William Johnson Unless you make them look stupid Christy Cornell. I am blocked from posting on that page. In reality it's best to just ignore those pages, they are just a distraction.
  • Lisa Gaffney Not even worth the time to look - that's just what they want you to do, and who CARES what these losers have to say anyway? They're worthless scum. The end.
  • Jon Felosi Ha yall will just be pissed off and nothing at all to do about it without feeding into it if you post on those pages. Dont pay attention to them. In the normal run of things I would never have anything to do with such scum and I seriously dont worry about what they say about me. Whatever they say is immaterial to me as I dont waste brain energy and sure as hell no emotions on it. SO best not to even look at them,
  • William Johnson Oops.. Haha, just realized that's a different page than I thought. Nevermind, not blocked from truth and nothing butt hurts..
  • Lisa Gaffney This is a public group you're all discussing this on - and there are known allies to these idiotic pages within this group. Translated, they're no doubt reading every word of this. Ryan , I would ask that you think twice before reading and then throwing this info at people that they're being talked about on those vile, dumbass pages. People who want to see will see - the rest of us don't care and don't care to hear the play by play of what some lowlife is saying about us. It's really not benefitting anyone except the sick people who post this shit - it's like free advertising for them.
  • Susan DeVilder I just think of it this way: The more time they spend on that stupid, inane page, the less time they actually have to do something to save their breed of choice and the less time they have making stupid comments about nanny dogs and blame the deed on news sties. Of course, I would expect nothing less from pit bull advocates. They are clueless about what they are doing so obsessing over a page that gets 12 views a day doesn't surprise me about them at all. Par for the course.
  • Marie McGrath There are moles. Just yesturday the comment of them kicking kittens was repeated. All I have to say is "here moley, moley,moley, good dog!.
  • Marc Brown There's no such thing as a mole in a public group. You know at all times that all the world can read anything you write.
  • James Hassinger Marie McGrath kimmy repeated that she kicks kittens? wow I was joking, didn't know she really does it!
  • Cat Cleeb WOOHOO FOAMER TALK IS GONE!!!
  • James Hassinger Cat Cleeb YAAA!! Karma strikes again. Think she'll stop?
  • Rachel Simas Lol you KNOW she won't James. She'll be back at it by the end of the day with a new page. She's determined to be queen nuttress and somehow she thinks bashing victims is the ticket to making it happen.
  • Harve Morgan I just got a notice that they had removed the page. Before they said they removed photos but the page was taken off so they couldn't do anything (I don't quite understand it myself) but now it says they are informing Foamer that the page is removed.
  • Cat Cleeb Haha like Rachel said she'll be back at it in to time but hey small victories here and there feel good! I got a notice saying they revised my report and decided to remove the page.
  • Christy Cornell Woot, woot! Just got the notification that Foamer Talk was taken down.
  • Christy Cornell I'm sure Kimmy and company will find a way to come back, but it is nice to see the Queen of Pitbull Victim Harassment be knocked off her throne, even if it's only temporarily.
  • Christy Cornell You know the nutters are gonna be gunning for us now. IMHO, it might be smart if the administrators of ALL of our pro-BSL pages/groups would consider reviewing the page/group and make sure there is nothing which could be considered harassment and reported to FB.
  • Marie McGrath I got my notice. Dang, just last week I told a nutter that page was doomed to fail, should've wagered on it. Teehee
  • Lisa Gaffney I just got a notice saying they revised the report and removed the page also.
  • Lucinda Hollingsworth Boutin What's her name so we can block her?
  • Christy Cornell Party's over. Looks like the victim harassers are back at it. 
    Maybe they've learned to quit telling lies or at least keep it classy if they want to co-exist. 

    https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=554063728027260
  • Carol Miller Margery Cavins posted a "welcome back" message on this page. OMG....
  • Lucinda Hollingsworth Boutin If you block her does that block all her pages to?
  • Rachel Simas No, but blocking her helps keep her from seeing your comments and taking screenshots. I haven't come up often on her pages, even though I sometimes say some controversial things and I think it's because I've got most of the right people blocked.
  • Marie McGrath Lucinda, it doesn't, pages can't be blocked.
  • Rachel Simas Don't forget to block the page too, go to foamer talk after hours, click the icon like you're going to report the page and there is a block page option. It can help keep her from using the page to hide and snoop on us.
  • Lisa Gaffney Carol , why do the admins tolerate her being part of THIS group? Kick her ass OUT
  • William Johnson I forgot she was in it. She never comments anymore. Maybe Margery will comment here and explain.
  • Carol Miller She is lead apologist on the Dog Bite Law page.
  • Christy Cornell Lisa Gaffney , don't forget that it's a public group. Anyone can see it and screenshot/ flag/ whatever. Kicking a member out is futile unless they are being kicked out for making unacceptable comments. Not only that, just like in most sites there's likely moles. I just pretty much assume anything I write on the internet will be seen by a PBA. That includes pm's.
  • William Johnson Yes, I am well aware of that. She's made it very clear that no dog ever attacks unprovoked, and it's the victims fault for not understanding the triggers the dog stacked for them as they were provoking the attack. I'm fair, I'll give her time to respond, if she doesn't I'll discuss removing her with the other admins.
  • Lisa Gaffney Christy , I understand that but to have her showing as a "member" here is another thing. Especially when she is so clearly and openly against everything this group stands for.
  • Jeff Borchardt “Four pit bulls equal danger,” said attorney Kenneth M. Phillips, the leading California attorney in dog-bite cases. “When you have a dangerous condition, you have to take steps to correct it.”

    But juries don’t always convict. Phillips said that if the owner shows sufficient remorse, juries often sympathize.

    So why bother? Because to protect our neighborhoods and our children, examples must be made.

    Large, aggressive dogs are more prevalent in poor neighborhoods. Some people, unable to own a gun, get a pit bull. You can watch them on the TV show “Pit Bulls and Parolees” on Animal Planet.

    “It’s amazing what the entertainment industry will produce,” said Sheriff Christianson.

    Said Phillips, “You’ve got this whole bunch of people not allowed to carry weapons so they arm themselves with pit bulls and somehow this has turned into a TV series to glorify them.”

    Worse, some politicians protect them. In 2004, a bill from Tom Hayden banned “breed specific laws,” meaning you can’t have separate rules for aggressive breeds. If a county allows a person to own four dogs, they can be four poodles or four pit bulls.

    If there are no laws under which the owners of deadly animals can be charged, and if wrongheaded laws equate targeting dangerous breeds with doggie discrimination, how is law enforcement supposed to keep such vicious attacks from happening?

    They can’t, unless the laws change.

    If law enforcement cannot charge, then our lawmakers must step up and fix these laws.

    Read more here: http://www.modbee.com/.../editorials/article3499964.html...
  • Christy Cornell Wow. And she STILL claims she's always polite. Dang, if I'm not stupid because I actually believed her about that politeness jazz and was trying extra hard to be polite after Margery stated she had that phone call incident. 

    She claims one of her goals is gaining a level of civility. Margery and I have always butted heads because I don't think we all should be held to HER idea of civility. She misses the point that people vary on just what civility means. Maybe she feels differently, but to me, civility would mean hitting the "like" button at Foamer talk, but not making a comment categorizing all victim's advocates the way she did with those labels. I thought she was in a better place emotionally since she started that new private group. She has frequently commented that rude people prevented a " safe" place for debate. I figured that she could run that new private group she started EXACTLY the way she wanted, so she would now feel "safe" there to discuss dogs. I was really hoping she'd find her place to do what it was she wanted to do with the civil debate. 

    No worries. The wool will always fall off the wolf, and truth comes out eventually. Like I USED to believe that Margery was actually neutral about pitbulls.
  • William Johnson Margery may be neutral about pit bulls. She just has zero sympathy for dog attack victims, even children.
  • Lisa Gaffney Just the fact that she "likes" all these "frother" posts and is buddy/buddy with people like Kim S is pretty black and white where she stands. She may claim she is neutral but actions speak much louder than words. Personally I think it is a disgrace to this group to allow such a person membership here.
  • Christy Cornell Totally understood. Believe me, Lisa Gaffney, I'm not arguing with you against it. LOL! I have no problem with someone being kicked out of a group called TPBPMR if they are actively engaging in spreading pitbull propaganda.
  • Lisa Gaffney I know Christy 
  • William Johnson She'll be removed at 9pm EST unless she can sufficiently explain why she should remain. I agree with you Lisa Gaffney, but I'm curious if she has anything to say about it.
  • Christy Cornell I didn't see where anyone tagged her, so I'll do it. 

    Margery Cavins
  • Rachel Simas I think margery pretends to be neutral so that she can hook people who are new to the issue and try to turn them against us.
  • Christy Cornell Back at cha, Lisa Gaffney . 
  • William Johnson Good observation Rachel Simas. When Margery first started commenting here and in DBL, we had 10 mutual friends, that's now down to one- a pit bull attack victim who is not active on FB.
  • William Johnson Just checked that again, the one I thought is no longer a mutual but apparently she has another pit bull attack victim as a friend now.
  • Jenny Pollman Yeah I deleted her too... She's not who I thought she was....
  • Lisa Gaffney Same here Jenny ... Sad but I think she is naive and wants to see good in people that doesn't necessarily exist. I unfriended too - I will always offer support to this person but not worth exposing my personal data through a friend connection.
  • Jenny Pollman I didn't talk to her anyway. And I won't. I've seen enough from her. No compassion for victims. Not someone I want to talk to.
  • Lisa Gaffney ^ talking about the victim who befriended her, just to be clear.
  • William Johnson Margery has been removed.
  • Pia Leavy

No comments:

Post a Comment